
Reviewing the Approval Record
Use the sourced framework to establish the operative record, test current status, and translate findings into assigned decisions.
Review the approval-record framework
Services / Project Feasibility & Due Diligence
Establish the operative record, test the assumptions behind the development thesis, and assign the questions that could change the transaction or project path.
The scope should begin with the decision the sponsor must make: pursue a site, price an acquisition, release a contingency, select a plan, reset an existing project, or authorize the next professional workstream. The diligence standard follows from what that decision requires the team to rely on.
CDA organizes the documentary record, business assumptions, approval path, dependencies, and assigned verification. The work gives the sponsor a traceable basis for action while preserving the separate responsibilities of agencies, counsel, engineers, surveyors, environmental consultants, architects, financial advisers, and other qualified professionals.

Collect adopted resolutions, ordinances, findings, conditions, approved plans, tentative maps, incorporated exhibits, amendments, extensions, and later agency actions.
Identify the CEQA document, notices, findings, mitigation program, monitoring evidence, project description, and later environmental review relevant to the current plan.
Inventory development agreements, dedications, improvement obligations, fees, affordable-housing commitments, utility arrangements, and third-party consents.
Distinguish tentative-map approval from final-map, grading, building, infrastructure, and other technical or ministerial steps.
Organize title, access, utilities, grading, geotechnical, drainage, infrastructure, phasing, cost, and schedule inputs for review by the responsible professionals.
When relevant, identify DRE public-report status, subdivision filings, ownership documents, budgets, reserves, and remaining professional or agency inputs.
Compare the business plan with the approved project description, plans, conditions, map, phasing, and recorded obligations. Assign discrepancies for agency and professional evaluation.
Identify missing exhibits, uncertain expiration or extension status, unresolved conditions, later approvals, technical work, agency discretion, and third-party action.
Connect each open issue to diligence timing, price, closing conditions, project scope, professional cost, schedule contingency, post-closing responsibility, or a sponsor decision.
A concise brief sits above the supporting register so the sponsor can see the decision, its evidentiary basis, the assumptions that matter, and the follow-up required before the next commitment.
Define the sponsor decision, deadline, reliance required, materiality thresholds, available records, and agreed scope.
Index the source documents, control versions, connect incorporated exhibits, and identify missing or conflicting evidence.
Trace approvals, conditions, changes, technical dependencies, agency actions, and obligations against the intended project.
Route legal, technical, environmental, financial, title, agency, and other questions to the responsible reviewer.
Record verified facts, assumptions, open issues, options, responsibilities, dates, and the consequence of unresolved items.

Share the decision ahead, the approval record available, the principal assumptions, and the questions that could change the transaction or development path.
Schedule a Consultation