Skip to main content
A California coastal development setting.

Our Process

A Clear Process from Vision to Approval

Our six-step approach brings clarity to complexity, aligns stakeholders, and keeps project decisions moving.

A Structured Six-Step Approach

The framework establishes a current project definition, named responsibilities, visible dependencies, a decision record, and an agreed communication rhythm. The sequence is tailored to the project, jurisdiction, stage, and scope; it does not predetermine agency timing or outcomes.

  1. 1

    Discovery & Due Diligence

    Clarify project objectives, the decision ahead, known site and jurisdiction context, assumptions, constraints, information gaps, and professional input needs.

  2. 2

    Strategy & Planning

    Develop the advisory roadmap, decision criteria, responsibilities, agency touchpoints, specialist dependencies, and working sequence.

  3. 3

    Entitlements & Approvals

    Coordinate applications, plans, studies, team inputs, agency meetings, comments, hearings, revisions, and decisions without substituting for agency authority.

  4. 4

    Design Coordination & Project Refinement

    Keep the project definition current as architects, engineers, surveyors, environmental specialists, counsel, sponsors, and agencies contribute within their roles.

  5. 5

    Final Approvals & Public Reports

    Track agency decisions, conditions, public-report workstreams, legal and specialist inputs, remaining dependencies, and responsibility handoffs.

  6. 6

    Implementation & Beyond

    Support scoped condition tracking, permits, final documents, phase transitions, professional-team coordination, and implementation handoffs.

What Clients Can Expect

  • Clarity

    Key decisions, assumptions, dependencies, agency authority, and open questions remain visible.

  • Coordination

    Responsibilities, professional roles, communication, review cycles, and next actions stay connected.

  • Momentum

    The team maintains a current workplan and decision record without promising timing or an agency outcome.

What the Framework Organizes

A disciplined process does not guarantee a result; it gives the project team a reliable way to see current facts, authority, responsibilities, and next decisions.

  • Clarity

    Separate verified facts, sponsor direction, professional advice, agency direction, assumptions, and open questions.

  • Coordination

    Name responsible contributors, professional boundaries, dependencies, communication channels, and decision owners.

  • Current Status

    Maintain an accessible record of work completed, review status, comments, conditions, and unresolved decisions.

  • Practical Next Steps

    Assign focused actions to CDA, the sponsor, public agencies, counsel, or the appropriate licensed or qualified specialist.

Example Scope-Dependent Deliverables

  • Feasibility Memorandum

    A decision-focused summary of assumptions, known context, information gaps, specialist needs, and options.

  • Entitlement Roadmap

    An anticipated path showing applications, professional inputs, agency touchpoints, dependencies, and decision gates.

  • Submission Tracker

    A current record of package components, responsible contributors, review status, comments, revisions, and next actions.

  • Public-Report Workplan

    A project-specific coordination plan for documents, counsel and specialist inputs, submissions, review cycles, and agency status.

  • Hearing Preparation Plan

    A scope-specific plan for factual materials, team roles, decision questions, public process, and follow-through.

  • Implementation Tracker

    A record of adopted direction, conditions, responsibilities, dependencies, phase transitions, and handoffs.

Build a Clear Path Forward

Tell CDA where the project stands and which decision or coordination challenge is ahead. CDA will arrange a conversation if the engagement appears to fit.

Schedule a Consultation