Skip to main content
A residential community set along California hillsides.

Feasibility & Due Diligence

Due Diligence for Access, Utilities, and Off-Site Improvements

A practical framework for testing legal rights, physical capacity, provider conditions, required improvements, funding obligations, phasing assumptions, and the evidence supporting project delivery.

By California Development AdvisoryPublished August 11, 2026Reviewed August 11, 202610 min readChecklist

Key Takeaways

  • Access and utility diligence should identify the right, capacity, improvement, agreement, cost, timing, and approval path for each system serving the project.
  • Every material assumption should carry an evidence level and a defined path to the next level of certainty.
  • Off-site work should be evaluated together with property rights, agency authority, funding, design, construction, acceptance, and phase timing.

Delivery Depends on Systems Beyond the Site Boundary

A development plan can depend on access, water, wastewater, drainage, electricity, gas, communications, fire service, and off-site improvements controlled by public agencies, utilities, districts, private owners, or adjacent projects. Each system has its own rights, technical standards, capacity analysis, agreements, fees, schedules, and decision makers.

The Subdivision Map Act connects subdivision review to plan consistency, site suitability, public health, environmental effects, and conflicts with certain public easements. Government Code section 66473.7 establishes a sufficient-water-supply verification requirement for defined residential subdivisions above its statutory thresholds. Government Code section 66462.5 addresses certain off-site improvement conditions where the necessary property interest has yet to be secured. For residential subdivision offerings, Business and Professions Code section 11018 identifies vehicular access, potable domestic water, and financial arrangements for off-site and community facilities among the matters relevant to DRE’s examination.

A useful diligence program translates these requirements and project facts into one delivery record. That record should show the present evidence, remaining approvals, responsible parties, cost and schedule exposure, and decision required from the sponsor.

Begin with an Evidence Ladder

Assign each material access, utility, or off-site assumption an evidence level. A practical ladder is:

  1. Planning assumption: a concept used for early feasibility.
  2. Preliminary professional assessment: an engineer, planner, surveyor, or other specialist has evaluated the concept based on available information.
  3. Provider or agency discussion: the responsible body has discussed the concept, with the date, participants, and qualifications recorded.
  4. Written conditional response: a service, will-serve, availability, feasibility, or agency letter identifies conditions and limits.
  5. Approved technical basis: plans, calculations, studies, or capacity analyses have received the applicable professional and agency review.
  6. Executed rights and agreements: easements, permits, contracts, improvement agreements, reimbursement arrangements, or other instruments are effective.
  7. Funded or secured obligation: fees, deposits, bonds, letters of credit, assessment financing, or other required financial arrangements are in place.
  8. Constructed, tested, and accepted system: the applicable work is complete and supported by inspection, testing, acceptance, or service activation records.

The ladder gives the investment and development teams a common language for uncertainty. A written provider letter may carry conditions, capacity assumptions, expiration dates, improvement obligations, or approval contingencies. Record those limits beside the evidence level.

An Eight-System Due-Diligence Framework

2. Potable Water Supply and Service

Identify the proposed water source, provider, service area, capacity, infrastructure, rights, and approval sequence. The review may include:

  • public water system or other lawful source;
  • service-area and jurisdictional status;
  • demand assumptions and fire-flow requirements;
  • supply, treatment, storage, transmission, and distribution capacity;
  • connection points and required on-site or off-site facilities;
  • water rights, contracts, allocations, or provider conditions;
  • meters, fees, deposits, and cost participation;
  • construction, testing, acceptance, and service activation;
  • drought, phasing, expiration, or allocation conditions; and
  • evidence supporting each conclusion.

Government Code section 66473.7 applies its sufficient-water-supply verification framework to a proposed residential development of more than 500 dwelling units and to the defined 10-percent connection threshold for certain public water systems with fewer than 5,000 service connections, subject to the statute’s full terms and exceptions. Determine applicability with counsel, the agency, the water provider, and the appropriate technical professionals.

For every provider communication, record the date, author, scope, demand basis, units or phase covered, conditions, required improvements, validity period, decision authority, and next action.

Diligence output: a water-supply and service matrix with statutory applicability, demand, capacity, infrastructure, agreements, costs, evidence, and delivery dates.

3. Wastewater Collection, Treatment, and Disposal

Trace the wastewater path from each project phase to the ultimate treatment or disposal system. Review:

  • responsible provider or permitting authority;
  • collection, lift, force-main, treatment, disposal, or septic concept;
  • current and projected flows;
  • downstream and treatment capacity;
  • connection location and elevation;
  • on-site and off-site improvements;
  • easements, access, and construction rights;
  • pretreatment or special-use requirements;
  • fees, capacity charges, reimbursement, and cost participation;
  • plan approval, permits, inspections, testing, and acceptance; and
  • phase, occupancy, and activation sequence.

A provider’s general service availability and the project’s engineered connection path may sit at different evidence levels. Record each separately and identify the work required to connect them.

Diligence output: a wastewater delivery diagram and responsibility schedule from project generation through final treatment or disposal.

4. Drainage, Stormwater, and Flood-Control Systems

Review drainage as a watershed and ownership system. Relevant questions may include:

  • existing and proposed drainage patterns;
  • on-site collection, treatment, detention, retention, infiltration, or conveyance;
  • off-site discharge points and receiving facilities;
  • flood-control district or other agency requirements;
  • easements and maintenance access;
  • downstream capacity and improvement obligations;
  • water-quality and construction stormwater requirements;
  • private, association, district, or public maintenance responsibility;
  • interim drainage during phased construction; and
  • inspection, acceptance, and long-term operating obligations.

Connect the hydrology and civil design to title, mapping, conditions, environmental documents, maintenance agreements, community budgets, and public-report disclosures.

Diligence output: a drainage responsibility map showing flow path, facilities, rights, approvals, maintenance, costs, and phase transitions.

5. Electricity, Gas, Communications, and Other Dry Utilities

For each provider and service, identify:

  • service territory and point of connection;
  • load or demand assumptions;
  • capacity and upgrade requirements;
  • relocation, undergrounding, trenching, vault, transformer, cabinet, meter, and equipment needs;
  • joint-trench or coordination requirements;
  • easements and access rights;
  • application, design, deposit, procurement, and construction milestones;
  • long-lead equipment and provider scheduling;
  • cost estimates and allowances;
  • energization or activation prerequisites; and
  • phase-by-phase service dates.

Record the provider’s current written position and the conditions attached to it. Establish a refresh date for letters or designs that may expire or depend on changing capacity.

Diligence output: a utility-provider matrix with load, connection, facilities, rights, applications, payments, lead times, and activation dates.

6. Off-Site Improvements and Property Rights

Create a separate record for each required improvement located outside the project’s owned property. Examples may include roads, intersections, signals, sidewalks, drainage facilities, water or sewer extensions, utility relocations, fire facilities, or regional improvements.

For each item, identify:

  • the governing condition, plan, agreement, or agency requirement;
  • the improvement scope and design authority;
  • property ownership and the right needed;
  • acquisition, negotiation, dedication, easement, license, permit, or agency proceeding;
  • environmental and permitting requirements;
  • utility conflicts and relocations;
  • cost estimate and funding source;
  • reimbursement, credit, fee, district, or cost-sharing arrangements;
  • construction, inspection, acceptance, and maintenance responsibility; and
  • the map, permit, occupancy, public-report, or phase milestone affected.

Government Code section 66462.5 provides a specific statutory framework for certain tentative-map conditions involving off-site improvements where sufficient title, easement, or license is unavailable at final-map filing. Counsel and the local agency should confirm the project-specific path.

Diligence output: an off-site improvement register joining the obligation, property right, design, funding, agency path, construction, acceptance, and delivery milestone.

7. Funding, Fees, Agreements, and Security

Translate each access and infrastructure obligation into a financial and contractual record. Capture:

  • application, plan-check, capacity, connection, impact, and inspection fees;
  • deposits, advances, true-ups, and refund provisions;
  • construction and contingency estimates;
  • improvement, utility, reimbursement, acquisition, and maintenance agreements;
  • bonds, letters of credit, set-asides, assessment financing, or other security;
  • credits, reimbursements, cost-sharing, or district participation;
  • escalation, expiration, and renewal terms;
  • lender, investor, or closing dependencies; and
  • the party bearing cost during each phase.

Separate amounts supported by adopted schedules, provider estimates, engineer’s estimates, bids, executed agreements, and working assumptions. Record the date and source of each figure.

Diligence output: an infrastructure obligations schedule with amount, evidence basis, payer, timing, agreement, security, reimbursement, and forecast exposure.

8. Phasing, Validity, and Delivery Sequence

Test each system against the actual development sequence. A project may have sufficient ultimate capacity and still face an interim delivery gap. Review:

  • which phase generates demand;
  • which improvement or right must precede that demand;
  • temporary and permanent service arrangements;
  • shared systems built in an earlier or later phase;
  • provider letters, permits, designs, allocations, or agreements with expiration dates;
  • construction windows and seasonal constraints;
  • adjacent-project or third-party dependencies;
  • acceptance and activation timing;
  • fallback paths; and
  • the decision date for each fallback.

Create a phase-by-phase utility and access release schedule. Connect the schedule to mapping, permits, construction, DRE filings, sales, closing, and occupancy milestones.

Diligence output: a systems critical-path schedule with evidence refresh dates and contingency decisions.

The Systems Evidence Matrix

A consolidated matrix can include:

  1. System or improvement
  2. Provider, agency, owner, or counterparty
  3. Project phase and demand
  4. Current concept
  5. Evidence level
  6. Source and date
  7. Capacity or performance basis
  8. Conditions and qualifications
  9. Required on-site improvements
  10. Required off-site improvements
  11. Property rights
  12. Applications, permits, and approvals
  13. Agreements and security
  14. Fees and estimated costs
  15. Design and construction owner
  16. Inspection, acceptance, and activation
  17. Expiration or refresh date
  18. Delivery milestone affected
  19. Open decision and owner
  20. Next evidence target

Questions to Resolve

  • What legal and physical path serves each phase for access, construction, emergency response, utilities, and maintenance?
  • Which provider or agency controls capacity, design, approval, construction, and activation for each system?
  • What evidence supports the current service or capacity assumption, and what conditions limit that evidence?
  • Which off-site improvements require rights on third-party property?
  • Which fees, agreements, security, credits, reimbursements, or district arrangements affect cost and timing?
  • Which approvals or letters expire before the projected delivery date?
  • Which interim gap or third-party dependency creates the greatest project exposure?

Practical Next Steps

Build the Systems Inventory

List every access, water, wastewater, drainage, dry-utility, and off-site improvement required by the proposed development and each phase.

Assign Evidence Levels

Grade every material assumption and identify the next document, analysis, approval, right, agreement, payment, or construction event required to advance certainty.

Quantify the Delivery Obligations

Create a current schedule of fees, improvements, rights, agreements, security, cost allocation, reimbursement, and timing.

Test the Phase Sequence

Map each system to the phase that needs it and confirm that rights, capacity, construction, acceptance, and activation occur before the dependent milestone.

Professional Roles & Agency Authority

CDA Insights provides general process information. Current law, local ordinances, provider requirements, title records, project facts, adopted conditions, and responsible agency decisions govern each project. Counsel, engineers, surveyors, environmental professionals, utility specialists, title professionals, financial advisors, and other licensed or qualified specialists retain responsibility for legal, technical, financial, and professional analysis. Public agencies, utilities, districts, and other providers retain their respective approval, capacity, service, and acceptance authority.

CDA Insights provides general information about California development processes. Requirements vary by jurisdiction, project type, project facts, and current law. Project-specific legal, engineering, surveying, architectural, environmental, financial, appraisal, tax, accounting, and agency questions require review by the appropriate professionals and, where applicable, the responsible public agencies.

Feasibility & Due Diligence

Acquiring Entitled Land: A Framework for Reviewing the Approval Record

Read Insight

Subdivision & Mapping

Before the Tentative Map: Five Decisions That Define a Subdivision Strategy

Read Insight

Subdivision & Mapping

Final Map Readiness: A Workplan for Approval, Recordation, and Handoff

Read Insight

Test the Infrastructure Delivery Path

Share the site, development stage, phase plan, current provider evidence, and open access or infrastructure questions. CDA can help organize a scoped systems inventory, evidence matrix, off-site improvement register, and critical-path workplan.

Schedule a Consultation